Vaping risk compared to smoking: challenging a false and dangerous claim by Professor...

Discussion in 'Politics, News, Media, Campaigns' started by The Counterfactual, Aug 15, 2019.

  1. The Counterfactual

    The Counterfactual RSS News Feed

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2015
    This blog examines an extraordinary claim by Professor Stanton Glantz that the US public is right to believe that vaping is as harmful as smoking and that science is now catching up with public opinion. This claim is profoundly and dangerously false, and it demands a challenge. This is a 13,000-word review looking in detail at Professor Glantz's 700-word commentary and its supporting citations, examining thirteen claims that form the basis of the overall claim relating to cancer, heart attacks, stroke and respiratory illness, impact on smoking cessation and population smoking. [...]

    Continue reading...
     

Share This Page